Recent Posts
- FDA Okays Blood Test for Ovarian Cancer
- Replication At DNA Damage Sites Highlights Fanconi Anemia And Breast Cancer Proteins
- ASCO To Hold Annual Meeting In Chicago For The Next Ten Years: City Seen As Best Choice To Host Meeting That Continues To Grow
- Protein Partnership Leads To Pediatric Tumor Regression
- ASCO Awarded CEO Cancer Gold Standard: Achievement Underscores Organization’s Commitment To The Health And Well-Being Of Its Employees
Random Posts
- Perceived Cancer Risks May Not Reflect Actual Risks Or Prevention Needs
- ECCO-ESMO: Experimental Drug Matches Zoledronic Acid in Bone Mets (CME/CE)
- Physical Scientists To Apply Laws Of Physics In Cancer Fight
- Cigarette Smoking Increases Colorectal Cancer Risk
- Stopping Tissue Stiffening Is Key To Preventing Aggressive Cancers
- Scientists Confirm Rare Genetic Mutations That Ramp Up Bowel Cancer Risk
- Research Award To Fund Plant-grown Drugs, Australia
- Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Predictors Of Prolonged Warm Ischemia
- University Of California, San Francisco, Researcher Receives ASBMB-Merck Award
- Can Sequential TACE And Cryosurgery Improve Survival Times For Patients With HCC?
Prescription Cancer Drugs
Researchers Develop Method To Improve Cancer Treatments
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on June 09th, 2010
Cancer patients don’t have time to waste, yet many must endure a tedious process of elimination as physicians try several different treatments until identifying the one that is most effective against their particular type of tumor. Now researchers at the University of Virginia Health System have developed a breakthrough method that could one day eliminate this trial and error approach to treating many cancers.
Their discovery is a novel algorithm, called COXEN (coexpression extrapolation), that rapidly sorts molecular information about a patient’s particular tumor and matches this information to a precise drug treatment.
“The most exciting aspect of this research is that in addition to predicting patient responses to therapy, the COXEN algorithm can be used to discover effective compounds for many forms of cancer,” says Dan Theodorescu, MD, PhD, director of the UVA Paul Mellon Urological Cancer Institute and co-author of the study. Theodorescu developed COXEN with co-author Jae Lee, PhD, director of bioinformatics in the UVA Department of Public Health Sciences.
“Because COXEN examines both cancer cells and drug activity at the molecular level, these newly discovered drugs should prove to be more effective in patients,” explains Theodorescu. “This pre-screening for effectiveness should greatly lower the failure rate of clinical trials that test new compounds and also should decrease drug discovery timelines. Basically it brings the chemists making the drugs much closer to the clinic.”
The study evaluated gene expression models (GEMs) and resultant scores for their ability to predict tumor response or patient survival in seven groups of patients with a variety of tumor types including breast (N=275), bladder (N=59), and ovarian (N=143) cancers treated with multi-agent chemotherapy. Some 233 patients were participants in prospective clinical studies.
Gene expression models provided effective prediction of tumor response and patient survival, while offering additional help to established clinical and pathologic tumor variables. For example, in bladder cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant MVAC (Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, Cisplatin) a commonly used regimen in bladder cancer, the three-year overall survival for those having favorable gene expression model scores was 81 percent compared with 33 percent for those with less favorable scores. Gene expression model scores for breast cancer patients treated with FAC (Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide) and ovarian cancer patients treated with platinum-containing regimens also stratified patient survival (five-year overall survival 100 percent compared with 74 percent, and three-year overall survival 68 percent compared with 43 percent, respectively).
“We are excited about these results and continue to work hard at evaluating the ability of this approach to predict the outcome of patients treated with the most common therapies used in oncology today, especially those novel ones involving targeted agents,” says Theodorescu.
“We believe we may have found an effective way to personalize cancer therapy. Our preliminary work seems to indicate that this approach may also be applicable to cardiovascular and other diseases, but more work is needed,” says Lee.
The multidisciplinary team led by Theodorescu and Lee involved collaboration with colleagues in several departments at the University of Virginia including the Departments of Public Health Sciences, Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, and Pathology.
The team is currently planning several national and international clinical trials, based on COXEN-derived gene expression models, for personalized medicine approaches using both new and established compounds against bladder and ovarian cancer.
Source: University of Virginia Health System
MicroRNA-Mediated Metastasis Suppression
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on November 08th, 2009
Metastases are responsible for over 90% of cancer deaths. In the upcoming issue of G&D, Dr. Robert Weinberg (MIT) and colleagues lend molecular insight into how microRNAs suppress tumor metastasis.
Scott Valastyan, lead author on the study, describes it as presenting “detailed mechanistic insight regarding the process of tumor metastasis, and identifies several key regulators of this process that might prove to be interesting diagnostic and/or therapeutic targets in breast cancer.”
Dr. Weinberg’s group previously showed that the human microRNA, miR-31, suppresses breast cancer metastasis and that its expression is associated with patient outcome. miR-31 regulates the expression of almost 200 genes. However, in this new paper, the authors identify that re-introduction of three miR-31 targets is sufficient to completely reverse miR-31’s influence on metastasis.
The researchers characterized both the individual and overlapping contributions that each of these three miR-31 effectors makes to the metastatic process. While three distinct steps are affected by this cohort of miR-31 targets (namely local invasion, early post-intravasation events and metastatic colonization), of particular interest was the finding that two of the three effectors regulate metastatic colonization - the final and rate-limiting step of metastasis.
Scott Valastyan emphasizes that “Our finding that miR-31, integrin-alpha5, and radixin affect the process of metastatic colonization may be of particular interest in light of the fact that colonization efficiency is strongly associated with patient survival outcome in many human tumor types - including breast cancer”.
Source:
Heather Cosel-Pieper
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory