Recent Posts
- Blocking Cancer-Promoting Protein: Enzyme Inhibitor Takes An Unexpected Approach
- Prevent Periodontitis To Reduce The Risk Of Head And Neck Cancer
- Over Ninety Per Cent Of Pathologists Find Research Rules Too Complex
- New Progenitor Cell in Mice Can Cause Prostate Cancer
- Aggressive Prostate Cancer Linked to Trichomonas (CME/CE)
Random Posts
- Penn Study Finds Inhibitor Of Heat Shock Protein Is A Potential Anticancer Drug
- International Study On Genetic Impact Of Radiation
- Discovery Of Gene Mutation Responsible For Hereditary Neuroendocrine Tumor
- KCA: Sequential Therapy May Boost RCC Survival (CME/CE)
- Is The Incidence Of Uretero-Intestinal Anastomotic Stricture Increased In Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy With Previous Pelvic Radiation?
- Breaking A Sweat Reduces Breast Cancer Risk, Says Stroller Strides
- Racial Disparities Found in Access to Colorectal Cancer Care (CME/CE)
- Heavy, Daily Drinking Increases Risk Of High-Grade Prostate Cancer; Makes Preventive Drug Ineffective
- New Publication Sets Guidelines Across Cancer Therapies: Ensuring The Best In Patient Management
- KCA: Targeted Drug Slows Progression in RCC (CME/CE)
Prescription Cancer Drugs
Tanning Beds Cited as High Cancer Risk
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on July 31st, 2009
HOUSTON, July 29 — Tanning beds have moved to the highest-risk cancer category of radiation sources in an update from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
Citing evidence from case-control studies and a meta-analysis, the IARC monograph working group “raised the classification of the use of UV-emitting tanning devices to Group 1, ‘carcinogenic to humans,’ ” the authors reported in the August issue of The Lancet Oncology.
In a meta-analysis published in 2006, the IARC working group concluded that people who begin using tanning devices before age 30 have a 75% greater risk of cutaneous melanoma than the general population (Int J Cancer 2006; 120:1116-22).
The working group also cited case-control studies showing “consistent evidence of an association between the use of UV-emitting tanning devices and ocular melanoma.”
The IARC reclassified all forms of ultraviolet radiation as a single carcinogenic entity. Historically, mutations caused by exposure solar radiation had been attributed to UVB. However, the same mutation was identified in UVA-induced skin tumors in mice.
UVA, UVB, and UVC previously had been classified individually as “probably carcinogenic to humans” (group 2A in the IARC system). In the updated report, the IARC moved UV radiation as a whole into the highest-risk category, eliminating distinctions between UVA, UVB, and UVC.
With regard to other sources, the IARC working group found insufficient evidence to conclude that welders face an increased risk of UV radiation-induced ocular melanoma. However, the group said, “a full review of the carcinogenic hazards of welding will be undertaken with high priority.”
The working group also classified all forms of ionizing radiation as group 1. Forms of radiation affected by the action included radon, plutonium, radium, phosphorus-32, and radioiodines.
| Working group member Nicholas Priest is an employee of Atomic Energy of Canada. Co-author Ron Mitchel is a consultant to Atomic Energy of Canada.
Co-author Colin Muirhead disclosed a financial relationship with the UK Ministry of Defense. Co-author J. Hall disclosed a financial relationship with Electricite de France. Co-author A. Green disclosed a relationship with L’Oreal Recherche. |
| Copyright 2009 |
online pharmacy ambien no prescription buy xanax online no prescription online tramadol buying xanax online buy soma