Recent Posts
- MicroRNA-Mediated Metastasis Suppression
- A New Explanation Of ‘Asian Paradox’
- Toward Bold New Anti-cancer Medicines
- Celsion And Yakult Honsha Announce Treatment Of First Patient In Japan In Celsion’s Global Phase III ThermoDox(R) Trial For Primary Liver Cancer
- $6.5 Million Gift To UCSF From Irwin And Joan Jacobs For Head And Neck Cancer Research
Random Posts
- SID: Vitamin D3 May Protect Against Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer (CME/CE)
- Tumor Suppressor Gene In Flies May Provide Insights For Human Brain Tumors
- Drug That Targets Vasculature Growth Attacks Aggressive Thyroid Cancer
- CytRx's INNO-206 Significantly Inhibits Pancreatic Cancer Growth In Animal Trials
- ASCO: Ginger Eases Chemo-Related Nausea
- Jersey Girl Study On Pre-Teen Girls Expanded - Effort Seeks Clues On Environmental And Nutritional Impact On Future Breast Cancer Development
- Bone Cancer Research Trust Calls For New Treatments For Bone Cancer
- Green Tea May Slow Prostate Cancer (CME/CE)
- Colorado State University Veterinarian Receives Lifetime Recognition For Research
- Discovery Of Gene Mutation Responsible For Hereditary Neuroendocrine Tumor
Prescription Cancer Drugs
Colorado State University Veterinarian Receives Lifetime Recognition For Research
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on August 16th, 2009
The American Veterinary Medical Association recently honored Colorado State University veterinarian Dr. Anthony Simon Turner with the Lifetime Excellence in Research Award. The award recognizes achievement in veterinary research.
Turner has been a member of the College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences faculty since 1977. Using the biological changes in ovariectomized sheep to mimic those seen in postmenopausal women, Turner’s early research studied osteoporosis — decreased bone density — and hot flashes. Osteoporosis, bone density loss and bone fractures are common among the elderly, occurring in about 20 percent of people older than 70.
In 1997, in collaboration with Dr. Clint Rubin, State University of New York, Stony Brook, Turner’s research results gained international attention by showing that the bone density in a sheep’s hind legs increased when they were subjected to a very low force delivered at high frequency. This technology is now available to improve bone density in women.
In other studies in collaboration with human orthopedic surgeons, Turner’s lab pioneered a knee prosthesis designed to replace cancerous bone, providing extra stability compared with traditional implants, minimizing the likelihood of a limb amputation. This custom-fit prosthesis is marketed by an orthopedic company and has been used in more than 400 human patients, giving new hope and an alternative to people facing potential limb amputation.
His current research is studying new surgical techniques for spine fusion, aimed at improving the success rate in humans with low back pain. He is also researching new techniques for rotator cuff surgery.
Turner is a professor in the Department of Clinical Sciences. He is a diplomate of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons, is on the review board of the Veterinary Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology, and is a consultant editor for Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice. In 2001 he was inducted in the Glover Gallery for distinguished alumni and faculty at CSU.
Source
Colorado State University
Diarrhea with Novel Drug Not Prevented by Corticosteroid (CME/CE)
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on August 16th, 2009
- Explain to interested patients that diarrhea appears to be a significant side effect related to the action of the investigational drug ipilimumab against melanoma.
- Caution patients that ipilimumab is not FDA approved for any indication.
Prophylactic corticosteroid treatment may not prevent moderate to severe diarrhea reactions with the novel monoclonal antibody ipilimumab for advanced melanoma, researchers found.
During ipilimumab treatment, grade 2 or higher diarrhea adverse events were just as common with budesonide (Entocort EC) as with placebo (32.7% versus 35.0%, P=NS), according to Jeffrey Weber, MD, PhD, of the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla., and colleagues.
Although the phase II trial failed, the results provided further evidence for “impressive” survival rates with ipilimumab in both groups, the researchers wrote online ahead of print in Clinical Cancer Research.
Overall survival averaged 17.7 to 19.3 months with the experimental agent compared with roughly six to nine months with standard dacarbazine (DTIC-Dome) treatment seen in prior trials.
Estimated one-year survival was 55.9% to 62.4% with ipilimumab compared with 25% to 44% with chemotherapy and immunotherapy in prior studies.
Ipilimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against CTL antigen-4 (CTLA-4), is a key negative regulator of the T-cell immune response, and preclinical animal studies have shown that blocking CTLA-4 enhances adaptive immune responses.
It also induces inflammatory adverse events, typically involving the GI tract or the skin.
To see if the oral corticosteroid budesonide — used to reduce GI inflammation in Crohn’s disease — could prevent these reactions, Weber’s group randomized 115 previously treated and treatment-naive patients with unresectable stage 3 or 4 melanoma to open-label ipilimumab (10 mg/kg every three weeks for four doses) plus daily blinded budesonide or placebo.
But after 16 weeks of treatment, prophylactic budesonide showed little benefit.
Overall adverse event rates were similar between treatment groups, with no GI or colonic perforations in either group but nearly all patients having some drug-related adverse events (90% with budesonide versus 95% with placebo).
Grades 3 and 4 immune-related adverse event rates were 29% and 12%, respectively with budesonide and 26% and 12% with placebo.
Notably, the immune-related adverse events appeared related to disease response or control. Partial or complete response or stable disease rates were:
- 46% to 59% in those with grade 3 or 4 events
- 26% to 27% among those with grade 1 or 2 events
- No objective responses and only one stable disease case among those without an immune-related event
Partial or complete response was the best overall response for 12.1% of budesonide-treated patients and 15.8% of placebo-treated patients.
Adding stable disease as an outcome, the response rates were 31.0% versus 35.1%.
Whereas tumor growth or new lesions usually mark treatment failure in advanced melanoma, the researchers reported two new patterns of clinical activity: “reduction in total tumor burden after the appearance of new lesions and/or response after initial increase in total tumor burden.”
Based on these patterns seen in ipilimumab trials, they recommended that progressive disease be confirmed radiologically at least four weeks later. “New efficacy criteria … may be required to more accurately describe the clinical benefit of ipilimumab,” they wrote.
The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb in collaboration with Medarex.
Weber and two co-authors reported receiving commercial research grants and speakers’ bureau honoraria from and being on an advisory board to Bristol-Myers Squibb. One co-author reported other commercial research support. Two co-authors were employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb, which also paid for editorial assistance. Weber shares a patent with Medarex on CT2A-4 antibodies.
Primary source: Clinical Cancer Research
Source reference:
Earn CME/CE credit
for reading medical news
MRI May Hinder Early Breast Cancer Staging (CME/CE)
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on August 16th, 2009
- Explain to interested patients that MRI appears more sensitive for breast cancer detection and assessment than traditional methods, such as clinical assessment or mammography.
- Note, though, that the review suggested no consistent benefits for surgical planning or outcomes with preoperative MRI for newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer.
Preoperative MRI scans for newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer may reduce a woman’s chances of conservative surgery without any improvement in either outcomes or the need for follow-up surgery, a review found.
The highly sensitive imaging technique detects 16% more cancer foci than traditional staging methods, typically leading to more radical surgery, according to Nehmat Houssami, MBBS, PhD, of the University of Sydney, Australia, and Daniel F. Hayes, MD, of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center in Ann Arbor.
However, “emerging data indicate that MRI does not reduce re-excision rates and that it causes false positives in terms of detection and unnecessary surgery; overall, there is little high-quality evidence at present to support the routine use of preoperative MRI,” they wrote online in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.
The assumption was that better detection and delineation of the boundaries of breast tumors would improve surgical planning or precision and reduce in-breast recurrences by eliminating disease that would have otherwise been missed, the researchers said.
Conventional staging with clinical assessment and mammography misses additional foci of cancer in 20% to 60% of affected breasts, compared with pathology.
However, clinical trials have shown that breast conserving surgery nonetheless produces the same survival rates as mastectomy since subsequent adjuvant radiation eradicates unrecognized cancerous tissue left behind.
The long-term risk of local recurrence is higher than with mastectomy but still low, typically 0.5% to 1% per year.
“Thus, the goal is to … achieve good local control, and to provide women who wish to conserve their breast a good cosmetic outcome,” the researchers said.
Anything that would impair a woman’s chances for breast-conserving surgery, “must be given very carefully and should be based on evidence that this will improve clinical outcomes,” they added.
Pooled results from trials reporting a change in surgical management for breast conservation surgery candidates attributed to MRI, based on detection of additional malignant lesions, indicated 11.3% had more extensive surgery than initially planned.
Rates for change to mastectomy ranged from 2.4% to 22.2%, and change to wider excision was seen in an additional 3.2% to 13.9%.
In these trials, though, histology revealed that many changes were unnecessary because the extra lesions detected by MRI were false positives.
One meta-analysis suggested one false positive for every 1.9 true positives detected by MRI.
In the pooled analysis of surgical management trials, 5.5% of women had wider excision or mastectomy prompted by false positives.
Reoperation, re-excision, and positive margins were no more common for women who didn’t have preoperative MRI than for those who did in the few trials to evaluate this outcome (P=0.17 to P=0.77).
With regard to long-term outcomes, one retrospective study suggested a lower local recurrence rate with preoperative MRI (1.2% versus 6.8% at 40 months, P<0.01), but another indicated no difference at eight years in local recurrence (3% versus 4%; P=0.51), local-only first site of recurrence (3% versus 4%; P=0.32), or overall survival (86% versus 87%; P=0.51).
Houssami and Hayes suggested similar arguments apply to use of MRI for contralateral breast assessment.
“Routine use of preoperative MRI in women with established, early stage breast cancer should be discouraged until (and if) high levels of evidence demonstrate that preoperative MRI either improves surgical care, reduces the number of required surgeries, or (more importantly) that it reduces at least local recurrence, if not distant metastases and death due to breast cancer,” they concluded.
Houssami reported funding by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council to the Screening and Test Evaluation Program.
Hayes reported support by the Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale.
Primary source: CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Source reference:
Earn CME/CE credit
for reading medical news
online pharmacy ambien no prescription buy xanax online no prescription online tramadol buying xanax online buy soma