Recent Posts
- FDA Okays Blood Test for Ovarian Cancer
- Replication At DNA Damage Sites Highlights Fanconi Anemia And Breast Cancer Proteins
- ASCO To Hold Annual Meeting In Chicago For The Next Ten Years: City Seen As Best Choice To Host Meeting That Continues To Grow
- Protein Partnership Leads To Pediatric Tumor Regression
- ASCO Awarded CEO Cancer Gold Standard: Achievement Underscores Organization’s Commitment To The Health And Well-Being Of Its Employees
Random Posts
- Understanding How Serious Breaks In DNA Are Repaired May Help Researchers To Make Cancer Therapy More Effective
- Stopgap DNA Repair Needs A Second Step
- More Women Chose Prophylactic Mastectomy (CME/CE)
- Gene Network Linked to Brain Tumor (CME/CE, with video)
- New Or Not? Cracking Cyclic Natural Products For New Drugs
- European CHMP Formally Adopts Negative Opinion On Oncophage(R)
- Heart Disease Is Childhood Cancer Legacy (CME/CE)
- McGill University Receives Almost $63 Million Under CFI Program To Support Five Research Projects
- Women Lag Behind Men in Cancer Trial Representation (CME/CE)
- Protein Inhibitor Helps Rid Brain Of Toxic Tau Protein
Prescription Cancer Drugs
Childhood Cancer Cases And Common Household Pesticides Linked In Washington Area
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on July 31st, 2009
A new study by researchers at the Georgetown’s Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center finds a higher level of common household pesticides in the urine of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a cancer that develops most commonly between three and seven years of age. The findings are published in the August issue of the journal Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
Researchers caution that these findings should not be seen as cause-and-effect, only that the study suggests an association between pesticide exposure and development of childhood ALL.
“In our study, we compared urine samples from children with ALL and their mothers with healthy children and their moms. We found elevated levels of common household pesticides more often in the mother-child pairs affected by cancer,” says the study’s lead investigator, Offie Soldin, PhD, an epidemiologist at Lombardi. Soldin cautions, “We shouldn’t assume that pesticides caused these cancers, but our findings certainly support the need for more robust research in this area.”
The study was conducted between January 2005 and January 2008 with volunteer participants from Lombardi and Children’s National Medical Center who live in the Washington metropolitan area. It included 41 pairs of children with ALL and their mothers (cases), and 41 pairs of healthy children and their mothers (controls). For comparison purposes, the case pairs were matched with control pairs by age, sex and county of residence. Previous studies in agricultural areas of the country have suggested a relationship between pesticides and childhood cancers, but researchers say this is the first study conducted in a large, metropolitan area.
Urine samples were collected from all child-mother pairs and analyzed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to look for evidence of organophosphates (OP), the chemical name of some household pesticides. The body breaks down OP into metabolites which can be tracked in urine samples. The researchers say pesticides were detected in the urine of more than half of the participants, but levels of two common OP metobolites, diethylthiophosphate (DETP) and diethyldithiophosphate (DEDTP), were higher in the children with ALL compared to the control children (p< 0.03 and p< 0.05).
Also for the study, the mothers completed a questionnaire to collect information about the family’s exposure to pesticides, their medical history, home and neighborhood characteristics, diet, and history of smoke exposure. More case mothers (33 percent) than controls (14 percent) reported using insecticides in the home (p< 0.02), however there was no correlation found between high levels of the OP metabolites in urine and reported use of pesticides.
“We know pesticides - sprays, strips, or ‘bombs,’ are found in at least 85 percent of households, but obviously not all the children in these homes develop cancer. What this study suggests is an association between pesticide exposure and the development of childhood ALL, but this isn’t a cause-and-effect finding,” Soldin explains. “Future research would help us understand the exact role of pesticides in the development of cancer. We hypothesize that pre-natal exposure coupled with genetic susceptibility or an additional environmental insult after birth could be to blame.”
The authors report no related financial interests. The study was funded by Lombardi’s Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute, and by philanthropic support from Debbie and Scott Amey.
Source:
Karen Mallet
Georgetown University Medical Center
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.





