Recent Posts
- MicroRNA-Mediated Metastasis Suppression
- A New Explanation Of ‘Asian Paradox’
- Toward Bold New Anti-cancer Medicines
- Celsion And Yakult Honsha Announce Treatment Of First Patient In Japan In Celsion’s Global Phase III ThermoDox(R) Trial For Primary Liver Cancer
- $6.5 Million Gift To UCSF From Irwin And Joan Jacobs For Head And Neck Cancer Research
Random Posts
- Advances In Treatments For Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes Take Center Stage At 10th Annual International Symposium In Patras, Greece
- $1.3 Million Grant Awarded To LSUHSC To Develop New Cancer Vaccine
- Lorus Announces Publication Of A Novel Analytical Method Confirming The Pharmacological Action Of Its Anticancer Drug LOR-2040
- MicroRNA-Mediated Metastasis Suppression
- ASCO: New Regimen Shows Promise in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Dose-Dense Chemotherapy Improves Both Overall And Progression-Free Survival In Advanced Ovarian Cancer
- A Surprise 'Spark' For Pre-Cancerous Colon Polyps
- Gliomas Exploit Immune Cells Of The Brain For Rapid Expansion
- Burzynski Research Institute Announces Positive Results Of Phase II ANP Clinical Trial
- Active Biotech's Cancer Project ANYARA Featured In Journal Of Clinical Oncology
Prescription Cancer Drugs
Study Says High-Cost Cancer Drugs Have Little Benefit, Strain Health System
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on July 09th, 2009
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Health Professional: | ![]() |
|
| Article Opinions: | php?associatednewsid=155972′ rel=’nofollow’>0 posts |
“Crunching data from published studies, the authors found that treating a lung-cancer patient with Wall Street Journal reports. The study, which estimates that the life of each American who dies or cancer could be extended by one year at the cost of $440 billion, was published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
The high cost and relatively low benefit points to “one of the thorniest questions facing lawmakers working on the overhaul of the U.S. health-care system”: reducing growing health care spending in the last months of patient’s lives. “Some countries, like the United Kingdom, agree to pay for expensive drugs only if they meet a certain threshold of efficacy, but no such rationing exists in the U.S.,” the Journal reports.
“While some policy experts consider the rationing of health-care resources inevitable in the quest to control medical spending, many Americans have long resisted putting the collective fiscal good over their individual health” (Johnson, 6/29).
This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at kaiserhealthnews.org.
© Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
View drug information on Erbitux.
Hunt For Blood Test To Determine Melanoma Survival Rates
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on July 09th, 2009
Research at the University of Leicester will be breaking new ground in the search for a simple blood test that could tell whether a patient with melanoma has the condition in an aggressive form. Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. Staging, which involves determining the size of the tumour and its extent of spread, is the best predictor of whether a patient will succumb to disease or survive.
However, its predictive ability is relatively inaccurate, particularly for patients with melanomas that have invaded deeply into the skin.
A simple blood test that can be used alongside staging to improve the accuracy of outcome prediction would therefore be an extremely important development.
The project, led by histopathologist Dr Gerald Saldanha and Dr Howard Pringle, both in the University of Leicester Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, aims to assess whether the measurement of a certain class of molecule called microRNA can identify patients who are more likely to have aggressive melanoma.
The study involves measuring over 600 microRNAs in the blood of patients with thick melanoma and analysing whether scientists can distinguish one set of melanoma patients in whom the disease has already begun to spread from another set for whom it has not.
If successful, this study would provide evidence that a blood test based on microRNA analysis could be further developed and used alongside staging.
This would enable more informed planning of treatment for patients who are found to be at greatest risk of poor outcome, while those at low risk could be reassured.
This research represents a new approach to the diagnosis and prognosis of melanoma.
Dr Saldanha, who is also an Honorary Consultant at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, explained: “I’m a skin pathologist and my job is to look down a microscope to diagnose melanomas and give prognostic information, in other words, the likely outcome for the patients. You tell that from the thickness of the melanoma from the top of the skin to the deepest point, and the deeper it is, the worse the outcome is likely to be.
“How good is that method at predicting outcomes? When the melanoma is very thin, less than 1mm, we’re good at predicting. We can tell that 95% of those patients will not have further disease five years after treatment.
“In the case of thicker melanomas we can only predict a 45%-75% five-year survival, which is little better than flicking a coin.
“In looking at the morphology of cells through the microscope we’re using methods that were used 150 years ago. It is an integration of everything that’s going on at the level of DNA and protein. There’s no molecular test that can match that at the moment.
“However, there’s a gap in our knowledge regarding the diagnosis of a minority of patients and a gap in the prediction of outcome for quite a significant number of patients. This project should add value to what I do by trying to plug the gap in predicting outcome.
“If you can combine the thickness of the melanoma with the microRNAs and tell that a patient has non-aggressive melanoma, you can reassure the patient and maybe avoid toxic chemotherapy or other drugs. But you’ve got to be very sure of your tests, of course, if you’re going to deny the patient the therapies.”
Thin melanomas are generally easily removable by surgery. Thick melanomas, once they begin to spread, may have a survival rate of as little as10 months. Gram for gram, Dr Saldanha says, melanoma is probably one of the most aggressive cancers. Chemotherapy has limited use, while other therapies based on modulating the immune system have had only a minority of lasting successes.
The new study is a collaboration between Dr Saldanha, who is a histopathologist, clinician and scientist; oncologist Steve Nicholson, who will be helping to take the blood from patients and documenting outcomes and Dr Howard Pringle, who is the molecular scientist of the group.
To eliminate ‘false positives’ (false leads) Dr Saldanha will also be working with bioinformatics expert at Nottingham Trent University, Graham Ball, hopefully ensuring that only important microRNAs are identified.
The project has received funding from the Leicestershire and Rutland charity Hope Against Cancer, in the form of a Rod Cassady Fellowship, which will enable Dr Saldanha to take on a researcher dedicated to the study.
He said: “This work certainly wouldn’t be getting under way without HOPE. This is a new project for us and the funding means I can tackle the research properly and thoroughly from the word go.
“Hopefully, it will pump prime the next stage, too, when we will need to find an independent group of patients to validate the microRNAs we’ve found. If we can reproduce the findings in a brand new data set that will be very important. This is the first step.”
While moles are harmless and very common, melanomas are rarer. Skin contains melanocytes which make pigment and sometimes these can form tumours, which may be aggressive and spread.
Melanomas are, Dr Saldanha says, in the second tier of cancers. Nationwide, doctors see about 10,000 cases a year, compared with 40,000 cases each for prostate, breast, lung and colorectal cancers.
However, the number of melanomas has increased 3-4 fold over the past 20-30 years and by a staggering 60% over the past decade, more than any other cancer, Dr Saldanha says.
“Melanoma is interesting because it’s very aggressive and it has this odd pattern of increasing incidence that we haven’t got to the bottom of. The biggest increases are in countries where fair-skinned people are exposed to the sun, like Australia, New Zealand and the US, but UV damage and skin cancer isn’t a simple story. It isn’t as straightforward as lung cancer, for instance, where the more you smoke the more likely you are to get lung cancer.
“It seems to involve sunburn in younger people. It’s one of the few solid cancers that is common in young people and is the commonest solid cancer in the15-34 age group. There’s some conflict as to whether it’s still on the increase or not.”
Source
Ather Mirza
Press Office
Division of Marketing and Communications
University of Leicester
University Road
Leicester
LE1 7RH
Cancer Survivors At Greater Risk Of Birth Complications; Special Monitoring Needed
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on July 09th, 2009
Survivors of childhood cancer run particular risks when pregnant and should be closely monitored, the 25th annual conference of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology heard today (Wednesday 1 July). Dr. Sharon Lie Fong, of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, said that, although such women may have conceived spontaneously and considered themselves to be perfectly healthy, their deliveries should always take place in a hospital.
Dr. Lie Fong and colleagues studied data on the pregnancies of 40 women who had been treated for cancer during their childhood, the majority of them for leukaemia, but also for solid tumours. Six had had radiation treatment directly to the abdomen. The data were compared with those from a control group of more than 9,000 women who had not had cancer treatment. All data were obtained from The Netherlands Perinatal Register, a nationwide database of pregnancy outcomes. Data were matched for age at pregnancy, year and month of delivery, and the number of times the woman had given birth.
“This is the first such study on pregnancy outcome in childhood cancer survivors as compared with normal, healthy women,” said Dr. Lie Fong. “Although we found no differences between most of the survivors and the control group, the women treated with abdominal radiotherapy delivered more prematurely. These women also had more postpartum haemorrhages the loss of more than one litre of blood after delivery.”
The team did not investigate overall fertility and miscarriage rates, but they believe that it is possible that the fertility of all the cancer survivors may be compromised. “We know that radiotherapy and some chemotherapy treatments are toxic to the ovarian follicles,” said Dr. Lie Fong, “and, in an earlier study, we had already found that ovarian reserve is smaller in adult survivors of childhood cancer than in age-matched controls.”
The ovarian reserve, or capacity of the ovary to provide eggs capable of fertilisation, is established in the foetus and decreases during a woman’s reproductive lifetime. Women with a poor ovarian reserve are less likely to conceive, even with assisted reproduction therapies, than those with a normal number of eggs. They may also have an earlier menopause, as their stock of eggs is exhausted at a younger age.
Long-term, multi-disciplinary follow-up for female child cancer survivors is mandatory, the researchers say. Although at the start of treatment, future fertility may not be of great concern to care providers, it is to the patient’s parents. And during follow-up, survivors should be made aware of the possible late effects of their treatment.
In addition to the deleterious effects of abdominal radiotherapy on reproductive function, radiotherapy to the head can also cause problems by causing the hypothalamus to reduce the production of follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone, both important in promoting ovulation. “We believe that it is particularly important for all female children who are treated for cancer, and their parents, to be made aware of this risk. Our research has also shown how important it is that, if they do become pregnant, childhood cancer survivors should be closely monitored throughout their pregnancy and that they are delivered in a clinical setting, rather than at home.”
The researchers say that even if at first fertility seems normal for childhood cancer survivors, there may be problems later in life. “We have yet to see whether the effects of cancer treatment include an earlier menopause,” said Dr. Lie Fong, “and this possibility should be borne in mind when counselling these women on their reproductive options.”
Source: ESHRE
