Recent Posts
- FDA Okays Blood Test for Ovarian Cancer
- Replication At DNA Damage Sites Highlights Fanconi Anemia And Breast Cancer Proteins
- ASCO To Hold Annual Meeting In Chicago For The Next Ten Years: City Seen As Best Choice To Host Meeting That Continues To Grow
- Protein Partnership Leads To Pediatric Tumor Regression
- ASCO Awarded CEO Cancer Gold Standard: Achievement Underscores Organization’s Commitment To The Health And Well-Being Of Its Employees
Random Posts
- New Journal In 2010 On Cancer Biology And Genetics
- Underactive Thyroid Linked to Liver Cancer Risk
- Study Identifies How Tamoxifen Stimulates Uterine Cell Growth And Cancer
- RSNA: Ultrasound Accurate in Young Women with Lumpy Breasts
- Early Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis Remains Elusive (CME/CE, with audio)
- New Route To Leukaemia Uncovered
- Europeans Inflate Survival Gain from Cancer Screening (CME/CE)
- Women Previously Diagnosed With Abnormal Cervical Cell Growth At Higher Risk For Recurrence And Invasive Cancer
- Green Tea May Slow Prostate Cancer (CME/CE)
- CIN, Cervical Cancer Risk Persist Despite Treatment (CME/CE)
Prescription Cancer Drugs
Quality of Life Might Help Decide Between Prostate Cancer Therapies (CME/CE)
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on June 17th, 2009
LITTLE FALLS, N.J., June 9 — Although the major treatments for early-stage prostate cancer yield similar survival rates, their effects on quality of life vary, researchers said.
- Explain to interested patients that, without a clear survival advantage for any of the prostate cancer treatments, side effects and how they affect quality of life may guide clinical decision-making.
Men who underwent treatment for prostate cancer with radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, or external beam radiation had different issues related to quality of life through four years of recovery, John Gore, M.D., of the University of California Los Angeles, and colleagues reported online in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
“Because no treatment has proven superiority in prostate cancer control, treatment side-effect profiles often determine treatment choices,” the researchers said. “These results may guide decision-making for . . . clinical management of patients with health-related quality-of-life impairments after treatment for localized prostate cancer.”
Other studies evaluating quality of life following prostate cancer treatment have looked at periods of up to two years, which the researchers said “marked a period of convalescence.”
To assess longer-term outcomes and the differential effects of the therapies, they followed 475 men who were treated for early-stage disease for four years.
Most (307) had had radical prostatectomy, 90 underwent brachytherapy, and 78 received external beam radiation.
The participants completed a questionnaire before treatment and several times through follow-up.
Overall, mental and physical quality of life measures were “largely unaffected” by prostate cancer treatment, the researchers said, but there were some significant differences between the therapies.
Urinary incontinence occurred more frequently in patients who underwent prostatectomy than in those who underwent one of the radiation therapies (P<0.001 for both).
Following prostatectomy, the likelihood of recovering any degree of continence was low after 30 months, a finding that “may guide clinical decision making regarding the optimal timing of secondary therapies,” the researchers said.
Voiding and urinary storage problems were more common after brachytherapy than after prostatectomy (P<0.001). However, the probability of getting back to baseline urinary function after brachytherapy improved through four years.
Conversely, patients who underwent external beam radiation therapy had a progressive reduction in the likelihood of regaining baseline urinary function.
All three treatments were associated with sexual dysfunction, but patients who underwent prostatectomy were significantly less likely than men receiving radiation therapy to regain baseline sexual function (P<0.001).
“Thus,” Dr. Gore and colleagues said, “a clinician may advise patients considering surgery that although they may be sexually functional, they almost certainly will not function exactly as they did before surgery.”
Treatment with external beam radiation was associated with a progressive decline in sexual function through the four-year study, whereas there was a slight improvement over time following brachytherapy.
Bowel dysfunction occurred more frequently following either form of radiation therapy compared with prostatectomy.
The authors acknowledged some limitations of the study, including the fact that patients might have undergone treatments that worsened pre-existing conditions.
In addition, they said, patients who had a recurrence of cancer were not analyzed separately.
| The study was funded by the California Department of Health Services.
The authors reported that they had no conflicts of interest. |
Primary source: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Source reference:
Gore J, et al “Survivorship beyond convalescence: 48-month quality-of-life outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer” J Natl Cancer Inst 2009; 101: 888-92.
Strativa’s New Drug Application For Ondansetron Orally Dissolving Film Strip Accepted By FDA
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on June 17th, 2009
Strativa Pharmaceuticals, the proprietary products division of a wholly owned subsidiary of Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. (NYSE: PRX), today announced that the U.S.
Cytokinetics, Incorporated (NASDAQ: CYTK) announced that a “In the ongoing Phase I portion of this Phase I/II clinical trial,Metatastic Breast Cancer - New Dosing Schedule Suggests Potential Amplified Clinical Activity Of Novel KSP Inhibitor
Posted by: admin in Prescription Cancer Drugs on June 17th, 2009
poster presentation summarizing interim data from the Phase I portion
of a Phase I/II clinical trial evaluating ispinesib, a novel
inhibitor of kinesin spindle protein (KSP), in patients with locally
advanced or metastatic breast cancer was presented at the 2009 Annual
Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) held from
May 29 - June 2, 2009 in Orlando, FL. This poster highlights the
safety and tolerability of ispinesib and tumor-reductions of 30
percent in 3 patients in this ongoing Phase I/II clinical trial of
ispinesib dosed on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. In this trial,
ispinesib appears to demonstrate anti-cancer activity with a similar
toxicity profile when compared with prior clinical trials conducted
with a once every 21 days dosing schedule.
have observed signs of clinical activity for ispinesib in patients
with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer without our having
yet reached the maximum-tolerated dose,” stated Henry Gomez, M.D.,
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru.
“Amplification of the anti-cancer signal on this newer dosing
schedule, combined with a favorable tolerability profile, suggests
the potential for this drug candidate in the treatment of metastatic
breast cancer patients.”
“The dosing schedule, an intravenous 1-hour infusion on days 1 and 15
of a 28-day cycle, studied in this Phase I/II clinical trial appears
to be both well-tolerated and generating encouraging signs of
clinical activity,” stated Andrew A. Wolff, MD, FACC, Cytokinetics’
Senior Vice President of Clinical Research and Development and Chief
Medical Officer. “We look forward to continuing the dose-escalation
of ispinesib in this trial as we explore the possible role of this
novel drug candidate in patients with metastatic breast cancer.”
Poster Presentation at ASCO
A poster titled, “A Phase I/II Trial of Ispinesib, a Kinesin Spindle
Protein (KSP) Inhibitor, Dosed q14d in Patients with Advanced Breast
Cancer Previously Untreated with Chemotherapy for Metastatic Disease
or Recurrence” was presented on Monday, June 1, 2009. This poster
summarized interim data from the Phase I portion of an ongoing Phase
I/II clinical trial evaluating ispinesib in patients with advanced
breast cancer. The primary objectives of the Phase I portion of this
clinical trial are to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)
and maximum-tolerated dose and to assess the safety and tolerability
of ispinesib administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion on days 1
and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The secondary objectives are to
characterize the pharmacokinetics of ispinesib on this schedule and
to evaluate the potential effect of ispinesib on biomarkers of cell
proliferation in patients with accessible tumors. The authors
concluded that one Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
(RECIST)-confirmed partial response (PR) with a duration of 6 months
has been reported. Also, two additional patients had a best response
of PR (unconfirmed), and 10 additional patients have had stable
disease not reaching PR criteria, four of which had a duration of 4
or more months. The authors also noted that protocol-defined DLTs of
Grade 3 ALT/AST increases with questionable relationship to study
drug were observed in two out of seven patients treated at the 14
mg/m2 dose level. The 12 mg/m2 cohort has been expanded to six
patients with no observed DLTs. The protocol has been amended to
further evaluate the 14 mg/m2 dose level.
Development Status of Ispinesib
Previously, in December 2008, at the San Antonio Breast Cancer
Symposium, Cytokinetics presented interim results from the Phase I
portion of its Phase I/II clinical trial of ispinesib. Interim data
demonstrated that this drug candidate was well-tolerated when
administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15 of a
28-day cycle, with the most frequent adverse event being neutropenia.
The best responses observed to date were investigator-reported tumor
reductions of 30% or greater in the sum of the target lesion
diameter, reported in 3 patients. One of these patients had an
investigator-reported PR according to the RECIST. Cytokinetics
continues to enroll and dose-escalate patients in the Phase I portion
of this trial.
In June 2007, Cytokinetics reported final results of a Phase II
clinical trial conducted by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) designed to evaluate
the safety and efficacy of ispinesib in patients with locally
advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose disease had recurred or
progressed despite treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes. In
that trial, patients received ispinesib as monotherapy at 18 mg/m2 as
a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 21 days. The primary endpoint of
the trial was objective response by RECIST. Partial responses,
observed in 4 of 45 evaluable patients, were confirmed by independent
radiology review and were seen in liver, lung and lymph node
metastases. The duration of these responses, also independently
reviewed, ranged from 6.9 weeks to 19.1 weeks. The median time to
progression in the treated population was 5.9 weeks. The adverse
events were manageable, predictable and consistent with those seen in
the Phase I trials of ispinesib. The most common grade 3/4 adverse
events observed in the 50 patients evaluable for safety were
neutropenia (21 patients), febrile neutropenia (4 patients) and
neutropenic sepsis (1 patient).
Source
Cytokinetics
online pharmacy ambien no prescription buy xanax online no prescription online tramadol buying xanax online buy soma